Skip to main content
G

Project Atlas

20 MW colocation — balanced · v1

AM

Demonstration data

Demonstration dataset — fictional parcel and infrastructure records for product validation. Not suitable for acquisition or engineering decisions.

Data and methodology

Everything the product knows, where it came from, and where it stops.

Limitations

Read this before any other section.

  • Every parcel, infrastructure record, constraint and event in this build is fictional. Corridor names provide orientation only.
  • Parcel polygons are generated deterministically from a centroid and a per-site seed. They are not cadastral boundaries and carry no legal meaning.
  • No output establishes grid capacity, a connection offer, fibre service, planning consent, land value or buildability.
  • Coverage is two synthetic corridors and twelve parcels. Nothing outside them has been screened, and an absent record is never evidence of an absent constraint.
  • Build Confidence measures the completeness and authority of the evidence. It is not a probability that a site will succeed.
  • Scoring thresholds are expert assumptions for product validation, marked in the configuration as requiring calibration.

Sources and coverage

DatasetStatusObservedRecordsCoverage and limits
Demo ParcelsDemo fixture2026-08-1448Complete for the 12 demonstration records. No cadastral basis.
Demo Power AssetsDemo fixture2026-08-1424Proximity only. Contains no capacity, queue position or connection offer.
Demo Network Queue RegisterDemo fixture2026-08-1412Corridor-level pressure indicator. Not a project-specific queue position.
Demo Infrastructure BulletinDemo fixture2026-08-1412Published programme signals only. Scope and timing unconfirmed.
Demo Fibre RoutesDemo fixture2026-08-1424Mapped route proxy. Availability, capacity and commercial terms unconfirmed.
Demo Strategic Road NetworkDemo fixture2026-08-1412Strategic network only. Local access and highways capacity not assessed.
Demo Title SnapshotDemo fixture2026-08-1411Title count proxy. No register entries, plans or encumbrances.
Demo Planning SnapshotDemo fixture2026-08-1412Allocation and use class only. Not national coverage.
Demo DesignationsDemo fixture2026-08-1412Major designations only. Safeguarding and local designations not included.
Demo Planning FeedDemo fixture2026-08-1412Illustrative determinations. Not a complete application history.
Demo Local Plan SnapshotDemo fixture2026-08-1411Adopted policy stance proxy. Emerging plans not tracked.
Demo Flood ConstraintsDemo fixture2026-08-1424Screened against all 12 demonstration parcels. Not a flood risk assessment.
Demo Ecology ConstraintsDemo fixture2026-08-1424Screened against all 12 demonstration parcels. Not an ecological survey.
Demo Water ContextDemo fixture2026-08-1412Corridor-level water context. No abstraction or discharge position.
Demo Heat Network ContextDemo fixture2026-08-1412Opportunity indication only. No identified offtaker.
Demo Market ContextDemo fixture2026-08-1436Corridor-level market context. Not transaction evidence.
Demo Land BulletinDemo fixture2026-08-1412Marketing and disposal signals. Not confirmed availability.
Demo Derived IndicatorsDemo fixture2026-08-1424Reproducible transformations of other demo records. Not observations.

Evidence authority mode: simulated. In simulated mode each fixture source is scored as the class of real source it stands in for, so the demonstration shows a realistic spread of evidence quality. In literal mode every record is scored as synthetic. Both are reported in docs/calibration-report.md, and neither changes the DEMO label on any record.

How a score is built

  1. Eligibility gates run first and independently. An exclusion requires a supporting observation; a missing observation produces unknown, never a pass.
  2. Each factor is normalised to 0–100 by a piecewise-linear curve or a categorical map from the configuration. A missing value returns nothing at all rather than zero.
  3. Groups aggregate their factors by weight, re-weighting to cover any omissions. Below 50% coverage a group produces no score.
  4. Suitability is the weighted mean of the scored groups. Below 70% total coverage the site is marked unknown rather than eligible.
  5. Build Confidence multiplies completeness, authority, freshness, spatial precision and corroboration for every factor, then takes a criticality-weighted mean and applies the caps below.

Group weights

Power
35%
Fibre and latency
15%
Land and deliverability
15%
Planning and policy
15%
Environment and resilience
10%
Market and commercial
10%

Confidence caps

power proximity without capacity evidence
65
fibre mapped without commercial confirmation
75
total coverage below minimum
39

Hard gates

  • minimum site area

    Site is smaller than the user's minimum gross-area gate.

    Evidence required: yes · unknown when gross_area_ha is missing

  • flood zone 3 intersection

    Parcel intersects the excluded flood-risk designation.

    Evidence required: yes · unknown when flood_zone_3_intersection_pct is missing

  • sssi intersection

    Parcel intersects a Site of Special Scientific Interest.

    Evidence required: yes · unknown when sssi_intersection_pct is missing

  • critical power distance

    No qualifying mapped power asset is within the chosen screening radius.

    Evidence required: yes · unknown when qualifying_power_asset_distance_km is missing

Factors

25 scored factors.

GroupFactorWeightDirectionCriticality
PowerPower asset proximity35%lower is better1.00
PowerIndicative voltage fit20%categorical0.90
PowerNetwork queue pressure20%categorical1.00
PowerPublished reinforcement signal15%categorical0.80
PowerTarget-date feasibility proxy10%categorical1.00
Fibre and latencyMapped fibre route proximity40%lower is better0.80
Fibre and latencyRoute diversity proxy35%categorical0.90
Fibre and latencyTarget-market latency proxy25%categorical0.70
Land and deliverabilityGross area headroom25%higher is better0.90
Land and deliverabilityParcel shape efficiency20%higher is better0.60
Land and deliverabilityExpansion adjacency20%categorical0.70
Land and deliverabilityStrategic road access15%lower is better0.60
Land and deliverabilityOwnership complexity20%categorical0.80
Planning and policyLand-use alignment30%categorical0.90
Planning and policyMajor designation burden25%categorical0.90
Planning and policyRelevant planning precedent20%categorical0.70
Planning and policyPolicy context25%categorical0.80
Environment and resilienceFlood risk screen40%categorical1.00
Environment and resilienceEcological constraint burden25%categorical0.80
Environment and resilienceCooling water dependency risk20%categorical0.70
Environment and resilienceHeat reuse opportunity15%categorical0.40
Market and commercialData-centre market context30%categorical0.60
Market and commercialLand availability signal25%categorical0.70
Market and commercialRelative land cost band20%categorical0.50
Market and commercialDelivery ecosystem25%categorical0.50

Versions

Scoring model
dc-screening-balanced 0.1.0-demo
Model status
demo calibration required
Model checksum
fb527f73daad87635108d95efca799847534d2063a5ebf33cbdcb51a41e1a827
Data snapshot
snapshot-sitesignal-demo-2026-08-14-simulated
Snapshot checksum
eeed2dc2ad641374c16c9400bd9a8247b9108daef2b7d74cbe90a8fa452675f9
Snapshot date
2026-08-14

Screening assumptions for product validation only. Scores do not establish grid capacity, fibre service, planning consent, value or buildability.